Why do scenery designers decide to improve payware airports? In some cases, correcting obvious mistakes. Why spend the money on payware airports that need correcting?

Small update today: 19 links to freeware airports, 12 links to payware.

We decided not to provide a link to an improved payware airport.

With so many external libraries now available, and designers commonly using a wide variety in their scenery, is there not a better way to manage libraries? And, how can I tell which libraries a scenery package requires? Just a thought.

55 airport links added today - all freeware. 

Enjoy.

74 links added today, 69 freeware, 5 payware.

Enjoy.

Should X-Plane have seasons by now? I know there is a plugin that can help but surely this should be included as part of the core program?

More rants soon.

Anyone else confused about X-Plane beta program? Beta updates appear to be thrown out the door with very little testing. Sometimes the update is pulled very soon after been released. Don't they have automated test tools? Doesn't seem very professional.

Moreover, we all want new features in X-Plane but development appears sloooowww. I can't help thinking that MSFS2020 is going to have a big impact on LR.

49 links added today - 47 freeware, 2 payware.

10 links to photoscenery added.

Instead of each flight simulator trying to replicate the entire Earth, why don't they get together and collect the raw data between themselves, and then draw this scenery in their respective software packages? Would save a lot of effort for each simulator collecting the raw data in the first instance (or in the case of X-Plane getting the users to do this for them via the Gateway).

Just a thought.

56 links added today - 55 freeware, 1 payware

1 link to photoscenery also added

Surprisingly, 1 link to X-Plane 9 scenery was added!

Starting to see a lot of scenery that is designed specifically for Vulcan/Metal. Hopefully, scenery designers will retain backward compatibility but doesn't look as if it is going this way.